DOE-HDBK-1141-2001 Module 4-7, Radiological Assessor Training - Student's Guide Module 4-7
Functional areas: Radiological, Assessor Training, Radiological Control Program, Radioisotopes
This Handbook describes an implementation process for training as recommended in Implementation Guide G441.1-12, Radiation Safety Training Guide, and as outlined in DOE STD- 1098-99 DOE Radiological Control (the Radiological Control Standard - RCS). The Handbook is meant to assist those individuals within the Department of Energy, Managing and Operating contractors, and Managing and Integrating contractors identified as having responsibility for implementing training required by Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 835 Occupational Radiation Protection (10 CFR 835) and training recommended by the RCS.
Unknown Block text
Related To:
Version history and related documents
Superseded by
A newer version replaces this document.
- DOE-HDBK-1141-2008Radiological Assessor Training (Aug 20, 2008)
Related documents
- DOE_HDBK-1141-2001Radiological Assessor Training - Foreword
- DOE-HDBK-1141-2001 Module 8-12Radiological Assessor Training - Student's Guide Module 8-12
- DOE-HDBK-1141-2001, Radiological Assessor Training - Overheads Part 1
- DOE-HDBK-1141-2001, Radiological Assessor Training - Overheads Part 2
- DOE-HDBK-1141-2001, Radiological Assessor Training - Overheads Part 3
- DOE-HDBK-1141-2001 Module 1-3Radiological Assessor Training - Student's Guide Module 1-3
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 4–1
I. Introduction
II. Radiological Control Program
A. Overall program
The Radiological Control Program consists of
the commitments, policies, and procedures that
are administered by a site or facility to meet the
EH Health and Safety Policy.
The Radiation Protection Program required by
10 CFR Part 835 is an element of the overall
Radiological Control Program.
The Radiological Control Program should
address the following:
• Requirements
• Responsibilities
• Programs/procedures
• Assessments
B. Size of the program
Radiological Control Programs vary in size.
There are several factors that may affect the
magnitude of a Radiological Control Program.
The specific mission, types and quantities of
radioactive material, and the radiation-
generating devices that will be used at the site
are just a few.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 4–2
III. Elements of a radiological control program
A. Requirements
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 4–3
B. Responsibilities
C. Programs/procedures
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 4–4
D. Assessments
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 4–5
IV. List of Radiological Control Program Elements
• Organization and administration
• Personnel training and qualification
• Quality assurance
• ALARA
• Radiological Work Control
– Procedures
– Radiological Work Permits
• Posting and labeling
• Radioactive material control
– Source control
– Release of materials
– Receipt and transportation
• Radiation-generating devices
– Sealed source
– X-ray machines
• Entry control
• Contamination control
• Instrumentation/alarms
• Monitoring
– Workplace
– Effluent
– Environmental
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 4–6
• Dosimetry
– External
– Internal
- Program management (e.g., staffing,
technical basis, procedures, quality
assurance)
- Individual monitoring (e.g., air monitoring,
contamination monitoring, bioassay)
- Internal dose evaluation
• Respiratory protection
• Facility specific features
– Uranium
– Plutonium
– Tritium
– Accelerators
• Radioactive waste management
• Emergency response
• Records
• Assessments/performance indicators
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 5–1
I. Introduction
II. Purpose of DOE Order 5480.22
The intended purpose of DOE Order 5480.22,
Technical Safety Requirements, is “to clearly state
the requirements to have Technical Safety
Requirements (TSRs) prepared for DOE nuclear
facilities and to delineate the criteria, content,
scope, format, approval process, and reporting
requirements of these documents and revisions
thereof.”
On October 10, 2000 an Interim final rule was
published in the Federal Register for 10 CFR 830,
"Nuclear Safety Management". The Interim Final
Rule was effective December 11, 2000, and codifies
requirements for TSRs in 10 CFR 830.205. The
new rule requires contractors to develop and submit
TSRs to DOE for approval by April 10, 2003. In the
interim, contractors are required to meet existing
safety bases, including TSRs.
TSRs are a critical element in the overall DOE
safety program.
Section 2
A. Definitions (Paragraph 6)
• Technical Safety Requirements are those
requirements that define the conditions, safe
boundaries, and the management or
administrative controls necessary to ensure
the safe operation of nuclear facilities and to
reduce the potential risk to the public and
facility workers from uncontrolled releases of
radioactive materials or from radiation
exposure due to inadvertent criticality.
Technical Safety Requirements consist of
safety limits, operating limits, surveillance
requirements, administrative controls, use and
application instructions, and the bases
thereof.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 5–2
• A controlled document is content maintained
uniformly among the copies by an
Administrative Control System (paragraph 6,
Item e).
Basis: Summary statements of the reasons for
the operating limits and associated surveillance
requirements. It shows how the numerical
value, condition, or the surveillance fulfills the
purpose from the safety documentation.
B. Policy (Paragraph 7)
It is the policy of the Department that nuclear
facilities operate Cognizant Secretarial Officer
(CSO)-approved Technical Safety
Requirements, which prescribe the bounds for
safe operation of these facilities in order to
protect the health and safety of the public and
reduce risk to workers.
The TSRs constitute a contract between the
operating contractor and DOE management of
the methods that will be utilized or constraints to
be applied to minimize the potential risk of
operating the proposed facility or conducting the
proposed activity.
NOTE: TSRs apply to actions by specific facility
personnel and their commitments to responsible
DOE managers.
The Technical Safety Requirements document is
to be a controlled document.
TSRs are not based upon maintaining worker
doses below some acceptable level following an
uncontrolled release of hazardous material or
inadvertent criticality; rather, the risk to workers
is reduced through controls that reduce the
likelihood and potential impact of such events.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 5–3
C. Source for bases (justification) of TSRs
In the development of limits, set-points, staffing
requirements, and other parameters for input
into the individual TSRs, the facility/operation-
specific Safety Analysis Report (SAR),
particularly the accident analyses contained
therein, is normally the primary basis.
The limitations that are included in the TSRs
should be derived from the facility-specific safety
analysis, which considers all credible accidents.
This includes the most significant possible
releases of radioactive and hazardous materials,
criticality scenarios, and the accidental releases
expected during the life of the facility.
Careful and thorough examination of these
accident analyses will provide values for defining
the operational limits necessary to ensure that
facility operations do not occur outside the
bounds assumed in the analyses. Such an
examination will also identify parameters and
operating conditions that should be limited in
order to reduce, provide warning of, and mitigate
the uncontrolled releases of hazardous materials
and to prevent inadvertent criticality.
Examples of requirements expected to be
developed include:
• Operating limits for principal process
parameters
• Technical and administrative conditions that
must be met
Section 3
• Availability of safety equipment and systems
• Critical functions of instrumentation and
controls
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 5–4
Operations within the boundaries of the resulting
requirements will provide reasonable assurance
that the nuclear facility will not:
• Threaten the health and safety of the public
• Pose an undue risk to workers from the
uncontrolled releases of radioactive or other
hazardous materials and inadvertent
criticality
For facilities that do not have an approved SAR,
the technical input into the TSRs must be
derived from existing documents/analyses that
specifically demonstrate the limiting conditions
that the facility is expected to experience during
normal operations and potential accident
conditions.
In order to serve as the basis for the TSRs,
these studies must systematically evaluate:
• All potential off-normal conditions that could
occur during the life of the facility
• What could be considered design basis
accidents
D. Responsibilities for TSRs
• Prepare → Contractor
• Review → DOE Field Office
• Approve → CSO
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 5–5
E. Identification of violations
Violations of a TSR occur as the result of four
circumstances:
• Exceeding a Safety Limit (SL)
• Failing to take the necessary actions within
the required time limit following:
– Exceeding a Limit Control Setting (LCS)
– Failing to meet Limiting Conditions for
Operations (LCO)
– Failing to successfully meet a
Surveillance Requirement (SR)
• Failing to perform a surveillance within the
required time limit
• Failing to comply with an Administrative
Control (AC) requirement
As stated previously, compliance with TSRs is
required by 10 CFR 830.205, violations may be
enforceable under PAAA.
F. Reporting Requirements (DOE Order 232.1A)
Occurrence Reporting and Processing of
Operations Information, July, 1997
• Categorization
– Emergencies
– Unusual Occurrences
– Off-Normal Occurrences
• Notification
• Follow-up notification
• Occurrence Report preparation
TSR ACs may impose additional facility- or
operations-specific reporting requirements,
which must also be carefully and fully followed.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 5–6
Violations of TSRs may need to be reported as
part of the Noncompliance Tracking System
(NTS). For guidance on NTS reports, refer to
Operation Procedure Identifying, Reporting, and
Tracking Nuclear Safety Noncompliances, June
1998, prepared by the DOE Office of
Enforcement and Investigation (EH-10).
G. Ancillary guidance
The TSR document shall be kept current at all
times so that it reflects the facility as it exists and
is analyzed in the SAR. The TSR must be
approved prior to changes in the facility or
facility practices.
TSRs should be written in a clear and concise
manner, in language that is understandable by
those in the facility operating organization. The
TSR should not contain excessive details that
belong more appropriately in the SAR.
The scope and content of TSRs are to be limited
to only the most critical nuclear safety areas.
This serves to make TSR Documents more
useful for controlling facility safety.
H. Radiological Assessment of TSR Compliance
TSRs typically specify requirements for several
areas that may be reviewed as part of a
radiological assessment. These areas include:
Section 4
Area monitors:
Criticality monitors
Area Radiation Monitors
Air Monitors (i.e., real time air monitors,
fixed head air samplers)
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 5–7
Surveillance requirements for area monitors
HEPA ventilation systems and their
surveillances
Shift Staffing
Facility staff qualification, training and
retraining
Audits and reviews
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Module 5–8
This page intentionally left blank.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–1
I. Introduction
The guidance in DOE-STD-1136-2000, Guide of
Good Practices for Occupational Radiological
Protection in Uranium Facilities, should be reviewed
in detail prior to conducting an assessment of
uranium facilities. The following is a brief overview
of the radiological aspects of uranium.
II. Radiological aspects of uranium
A. Radiological properties of uranium
Fifteen radioisotopes exist, but the three of most
concern to the uranium industry are:
Uranium-238:
99.7% abundant in natural uranium;
half-life = 4.5 billion yrs,
specific activity = 3.3 E-7 Ci/g
Uranium-235:
0.72% abundant;
half-life = 710 million yrs,
specific activity = 2.1 E-6 Ci/g
Uranium-234:
0.006% abundant;
half-life = 247 thousand yrs,
specific activity = 6.2 E-3 Ci/g
Enriched uranium has a higher content of
Uranium-235 than found in nature. Typical
enrichment values are:
• 2%-3% Uranium-235: power reactor grade
fuel
• >90% Uranium-235: weapons grade material
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–2
Specialized reactor fuel may have enrichments
other than those listed above.
The uranium byproduct of enrichment is reduced
in Uranium-235 content and is called depleted
uranium. Its typical composition is as follows:
• 99.75% Uranium-238
• 0.20% Uranium-235
• 0.0007% Uranium-234
As a result of the differences in specific
activities, Uranium-234 may account for a
significant fraction, or even the majority, of the
radioactivity for enriched uranium.
For example, for 3% enriched uranium (i.e., 3%
Uranium-235), the Uranium-234 (with an
abundance of 0.03%) would have approximately
6 times the activity as Uranium-238 and
approximately 30 times the activity as
Uranium-235.
Uranium-238 and Uranium-234 are part of the
uranium decay series, while Uranium-235 is part
of the actinium series. Therefore, following
chemical separation, decay products will
continue to grow in. The most significant of
these are Thorium-234 and Protactinium-234m
from the uranium series and Thorium-231 from
the actinium series.
Other small amounts of radioactive material may
be present as the result of reprocessing
uranium. These include Neptunium, Plutonium,
Technetium-99, and other radioisotopes of
uranium, including Uranium-232 and
Uranium-236.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–3
B. Radioisotopes
The primary radioisotopes of uranium are all
long-lived alpha-emitters. The specific activity
(Ci/g) of uranium increases as enrichment
increases; therefore, enriched uranium is a more
serious radiation hazard.
In most uranium facilities, the inhalation hazard
Section 5
from alpha particles released in the respiratory
tract is the predominant radiological hazard
associated with the alpha emitting uranium
isotopes. In addition, uranium decay products
are primarily beta-emitters. For external
exposure, the major concern is the high energy
beta particle from Protactinium-234m (2.29
MeV). As a result of beta radiation, the typical
contact dose with a block of uranium is
approximately 200 mrad/hr.
Trace contaminants such as Technetium-99 and
Uranium-232 may result in additional external
radiation dose when present.
As a result of the alpha-neutron reaction, casks
of enriched uranium hexafluoride may also emit
neutrons. Typical dose rates are on the order of
a few mrem/hr.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–4
C. Criticality
Uranium-235 and Uranium-233 are both fissile
materials; therefore, facilities handling enriched
uranium and/or Uranium-233 have the potential
for criticality accidents, generating large
amounts of neutron and gamma radiation.
D. Toxicological properties of uranium
Uranium is a heavy metal poison and is toxic in
much the same way lead or mercury is. For
soluble compounds of low enrichments (< 5%
Uranium-235), the toxic properties of uranium
override the radiological hazards. The kidney is
the primary organ of concern.
For insoluble compounds of any enrichment or
all compounds of highly enriched uranium, the
radiological hazards are limiting.
III. Detection, measurement, and survey techniques
A. Monitoring program
A radiation protection monitoring program in a
uranium facility must ensure the detection of
typical ionizing radiations over wide energy
ranges.
To detect alpha radiation from the uranium
isotopes, exposure rate surveys using photon-
sensitive portable and fixed alpha detectors
such, as zinc sulfide or gas proportional
counters, should be used.
Appropriate beta detection instrumentation
should be available to measure decay products
such as Protactinium-234m. If Technetium-99 is
suspected, special low-energy beta particle
detection equipment should be available.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–5
If large quantities of uranium hexafluoride are
present, appropriate neutron survey instruments
should be available to measure the neutron
radiation.
If the facility contains enriched uranium and/or
Uranium-233, appropriate criticality safety alarm
systems shall be in place and appropriate
neutron and gamma survey instruments
available.
Continuous air monitors (CAMs), sample
extraction lines that go to CAMs, and continuous
radiation dose monitors should be placed
outside glove boxes and fume hoods.
B. Survey Techniques
Monitoring practices include, but are not limited
to, the following:
• Contamination surveys of the workplace
• Release surveys
• External exposure surveys
• Airborne contamination surveys
• Routine surveillance by a Radiological
Control Technician
All work areas must be monitored for
contamination levels on a regularly scheduled
basis. The frequency of such surveys will
depend on the potential for dispensability of the
radioactive material. During these routine
surveys, all work enclosures, work surfaces,
floors, and equipment within the workplace
should be surveyed.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–6
C. Workplace characterization
Section 6
At the time a program is established,
measurements of external dose should be made
at all locations where it occurs to delineate the
levels involved (workplace characterization).
Additional measurements should be made at the
same frequency as the contamination surveys to
identify the buildup of uranium in HEPA filters
and glove boxes.
Airborne contamination surveys should be
performed for:
• Prompt detection of airborne contamination
for worker protection
• Personnel dose assessment
• Monitoring of trends within the workplace
• Special studies
IV. Personnel protection requirements
Workers in uranium facilities need to be
appropriately trained on the hazards. DOE has
developed DOE-HDBK-1113-98, Radiological
Safety Training for Uranium Facilities, 1998.
This handbook provides DOE's guidance on
expectations for training of uranium workers.
A. Personnel air sampling
The use of personnel air sampling programs
should be considered in monitoring individual
Radiological Workers.
B. Protective clothing
As a minimum, personnel who perform
operations in controlled areas should wear
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–7
coveralls, gloves, and shoe covers. No personal
outer clothing should be permitted under
coveralls. For inspections or visits, lab coats,
gloves, and shoe covers may be permissible.
Protective clothing should be removed at the
step-off pad, and personnel monitoring for
contamination shall be performed. If this is not
practical, strict control of the movement of
personnel shall be maintained from the step-off
pad to a location where protective clothing can
be removed. Personnel wearing protective
clothing shall not be allowed to mingle with
individuals wearing personal street clothing.
Protective clothing shall not be allowed in
uncontrolled areas such as offices, lunchrooms,
or control rooms.
C. Respiratory protection
Respiratory protection should be readily
available. Respiratory protective equipment
should be used for all bag-out operations, bag
and glove changes, and any situation involving a
potential or actual breach of confinement.
V. External dose control
A. Beta radiation
Beta radiation is usually the dominant external
radiation hazard in work with unshielded forms
of uranium. The primary concern is
Protactinium-234m, though other radionuclides
may be present. Particular care should be taken
in operations such as melting and casting, where
decay products could be separated and
concentrated. Appropriate measurements
should be made of the material and appropriate
extremity dosimetry worn by workers handling
the material.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–8
B. Gamma radiation
Gamma radiation is normally not the controlling
factor at uranium facilities. However, significant
gamma fields can exist in areas where large
quantities of uranium are stored. Appropriate
actions including time, distance, and shielding
considerations should be taken to maintain
radiation doses ALARA.
C. Neutron radiation
Neutron radiation from enriched uranium fluoride
compounds should also be considered in
determining potential external radiation hazards.
VI. Internal dose control
Intakes
In most uranium facilities, the primary radiological
hazard is the potential for internal intakes of
uranium. This hazard must be controlled by
appropriate facility and equipment design,
contamination control procedures, and protective
clothing.
Section 7
Inhalation is the primary route of concern.
Uranium transported from the lungs is deposited
in the bone (22%), kidney (12%), or other tissues
(12%), or excreted (54%), according to
International Commission on Radiological
Protection (ICRP) Publication 30.
Control must be verified by a bioassay program.
Urinalysis is the most common technique, but
fecal analysis and in vivo monitoring may also be
appropriate.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–9
DOE-STD-1121-99, Internal Dosimetry, provides
technical guidance on internal dosimetry
programs, including evaluation of occupational
internal doses from exposure to radon and
thoron. This standard should be reviewed prior to
conducting assessments of internal dosimetry
programs.
VII.Special controls and considerations at uranium
operations
A. Criticality alarm systems (gamma or neutron)
shall be provided in each area where an
accidental criticality is possible. Site
requirements documents relating to criticality
alarms should be reviewed prior to the
assessment, if applicable. These
requirements may include: ANSI/ANS 8.1,
Nuclear Criticality Safety in Operations with
Fissionable Materials Outside Reactors;
ANSI/ANS 8.3 Criticality Accident Alarm
Systems; ANSI/ANS 8.7, Nuclear Criticality
Safety in the Storage of Fissile Materials;
ANSI/ANS 8.15, Nuclear Criticality Control of
Special Actinide Elements; and ANSI/ANS
8.19, ANS Administrative Procedures for
Nuclear Criticality.
B. All DOE facilities that possess sufficient
quantities and kinds of fissile material to
constitute a potentially critical mass shall
provide nuclear accident dosimetry (fixed and
personal). The number of dosimeters needed
and their placement will depend on the nature
of the operation, structural design of the
facility, and accessibility of areas to
personnel. An analysis of the dosimeters and
their placement should be conducted and
documented.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 6–10
C. Uranium metal in finely divided form is
pyrophoric; therefore, any grinding or milling
operations must be carefully conducted to avoid
fires.
Uranium hexafluoride is commonly found in many
uranium operations. This material is a solid at
room temperatures but volatilizes readily at
elevated temperatures. As a gas, it is extremely
hazardous, forming hydrofluoric acid when it
comes in contact with water. Operations
involving uranium hexafluoride must be
conducted very carefully to prevent release of the
gas.
D. External radiation hazards from uranium are
primarily associated with decay products;
therefore, operations in which the decay products
can separate and concentrate must be monitored
carefully. For example, crucibles used to melt
depleted uranium and casks used to ship
uranium hexafluoride are sometimes more
radioactive after they are emptied than when they
are full. The reason is that the decay products
are left in the emptying process and are no longer
self-shielded by the uranium.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–1
I. Introduction
II. Radiological aspects of tritium
A. There are three primary sources of tritium.
These are:
1. Environmental sources - Reactions between
cosmic rays and the upper atmosphere
14N + 1n 3H + 12C
2H + 2H 3H + 1H
2. By-product of power reactors
Section 8
• Ternary fission - A fission event resulting
in fission fragments, one of which is
tritium. Occurrence typically has a 0.1%
yield.
B-10 (n, 2 alpha) 3H
Li-7 (n, n alpha) 3H
3. DOE production of tritium (Hanford,
Savannah River reactors) is by the following
reaction:
6Li + 1n 3H + alpha
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–2
B. Chemical and radiological properties of tritium
1. Chemical forms
• Elemental tritium (tritium gas, HT, DT, T2)
• Tritiated water (tritium oxide, HTO, DTO,
T2O)
• Special tritium compounds (STCs):
created by intentional combination of
tritium with the desired materials or by
inadvertent contamination of a material
that has been subjected to the presence of
tritium for a period of time.
These are classified in a number of ways,
depending on their host material (metal or
organic), rate of tritium release (stable or
unstable), and physical form (particulate or
non-particulate). They include:
- Organically bound tritium (OBT); the
main types of OBT encountered in the
DOE complex are solvents, oils, and
solid particulates (e.g., plastics, nylon,
and organic dust forms).
- Particulates; stable or insoluble forms
are referred to as stable tritiated
particulates (STPs).
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–3
2. Radiological properties
• 3H 3He + beta minus and anti-neutrino
• Emax = 18.6 keV, Eavg = 5.69 keV
• Half-life = 12.32 years
• Specific activity = 9619 Ci/gram
• ALIwater = 3000 MBq = 8 E4 µCi
(inhalation and ingestion)
• DACwater = 0.8 MBq/m3 = 2 E-5 µCi/cm3
• DACelemental = 2 E4 MBq/m3 = 0.5 µCi/cm3
• f1 = 1
• Committed dose equivalent per unit
intake = 1.73 E-11 Sv/Bq =
6.4 E-2 mrem/µCi
• DACelemental/DACwater = 25,000
In addition, DOE has issued guidance on
radiological protection for special tritiated
compounds in Radiological Control Technical
Position, RCTP 99 - 02, Acceptable Approach for
Developing Air Concentration Values for
Controlling Exposures to Tritiated Particulate
Aerosols and Organically-Bound Tritium.
DOE has also developed a technical standard,
now in draft, Radiological Control Programs for
Special Tritium Compounds, DOE-OSCH-0002.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–4
C. Potential exposure pathways of tritium
Dose pathways and biological effects
• Inhalation
– Elemental tritium (tritium gas) - Limiting
condition is exposure to the lung
– Approximately 0.005% of HT inhaled is
converted to HTO prior to exhalation
– Nearly 100% of inhaled HTO is
incorporated into body fluids/tissues.
• Ingestion
– Tritiated water
• Assumed to be instantaneous
• Biological half-life is normally ten
days, but may be reduced by a
factor or two-three with increased
fluid intake
• Skin absorption of HTO through intact skin
≈50% of that inhaled.
For different modes of entry of STCs:
– STPs behave with the characteristics
of the particle to which they are
attached.
- Soluble OBT distributes throughout the
body causing a whole body dose.
Insoluble OBT can be taken into the
body by inhalation when in particulate
form. Airborne droplets of insoluble
components of oils may be treated as
stable particulates.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–5
Section 9
D. General sources of tritium releases
1. Gaseous releases - ventilation exhaust
systems
2. Liquid wastes
• Aqueous
• Organic (e.g., oils)
3. Solid wastes
• Contaminated wastes
• Treatment residues
E. Exposure controls for tritium
The personnel protection requirements for tritium
include:
• Airborne contamination controls
• Surface contamination controls
1. Airborne controls
• Differential room pressure zones
• Dilution ventilation
• Room-air detritiation systems
• Local exhaust ventilation
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–6
2. Contamination controls
• Good housekeeping
• Good work practices
3. Personnel protective equipment
• Air supplied respirators
• Protective clothing
F. Metabolism of tritium
The tritium beta lacks sufficient energy to
penetrate the dead cell layer in skin. Therefore,
it is of little consequence as an external hazard.
The beta particles can produce Bremsstrahlung
radiation when they interact with matter,
although the tritium Bremsstrahlung is extremely
low energy. It is remotely possible that the
Bremsstrahlung exposure could become
significant around materials with very high
specific activities and little or no shielding.
Tritium can deliver a radiation dose if it gets
inside the body. Modes of entry include:
• Inhalation
• Ingestion
• Absorption
1. Inhalation
Tritium gas (HT) is only slightly incorporated
into the body when inhaled. Approximately
0.005% of HT inhaled is converted to tritiated
water prior to being exhaled. Depending
upon the rate at which HT converts to HTO in
vivo, it is possible that some dissolved HT
may be excreted in urine.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–7
Tritiated water (HTO) is much more
radiologically hazardous than tritium gas.
Inhaled HTO enters the body through the lung
fluids with 100% efficiency, and mixes rapidly
with body water. Nearly 100% of tritiated water
(HTO) inhaled is incorporated into body fluids
and tissues.
2. Ingestion
Ingested HTO is assumed to be completely and
instantaneously absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract and mixes rapidly with the
body fluids so that following ingestion, the
concentration in sweat, sputum, urine, blood,
perspiration and expired water vapor is the
same.
3. Absorption
There is negligible skin absorption for tritium
gas. Some HT can be absorbed through the
skin from contact with surface contamination.
This uptake is probably in the form of HTO,
resulting from the oxidation of HT. Some tritium
may be retained in the skin in the form of
organics, presumably resulting from exchange
reactions with HT on or in the skin.
HTO can be readily absorbed through the skin.
It will be uniformly distributed in all biological
fluids within one to two hours.
Most exposures are to HTO, which rapidly
enters the body water via absorption through
the lungs and/or skin. A small amount of HT
can dissolve in lung fluids, convert to HTO, and
enter the body fluids. Exposures to HTO are
approximately 10,000 to 25,000 times more
hazardous than exposure to HT. HTO has an
effective half-life in the body in the range of 4 to
18 days, with a mean effective half-life of about
9 or 10 days.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–8
Most tritium leaves the body either in urine or
through evaporation from the lungs and skin. The
dose commitment from an uptake of one curie of
HTO is approximately 63 rem.
Section 10
For the above 3 discussed modes of entry: STPs
and insoluble components of tritiated oils behave
with the characteristics of the particle to which they
are attached.
For dose calculations for STPs, ICRP Publication
66 uses absorption types; slow, medium, and fast
(S, M, F). These are used in place of the lung
retention classes (day, week, and year; D, W, Y)
used in ICRP Publication 30. Depending on the
absorption type of the compound, the dose per
intake will be different than HTO.
For example: The air concentration value (which
could be used in assessing dose per intake) for
Type S STP is 10 times more restrictive than HTO,
while the air concentration value for Type F STP is
5 times less restrictive than HTO.
Soluble OBTs act somewhat similar to HTO,
however a larger percentage of nuclear
transformations occur in the stomach. The dose
per intake is approximately twice that of HTO.
Skin absorption is also a valid intake pathway for
tritiated oil components and solvent OBT.
G. Methods of tritium containment
1. Primary - Process equipment and piping
2. Secondary
• Glove boxes
• Temporary vented enclosures
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–9
3. Tertiary - Room and associated ventilation systems
• Effluent recovery systems
• Emergency containment systems
H. Airborne tritium controls
1. Differential room pressure zones - The air
ventilation system plays a key role in controlling
the spread of contamination. In addition to
providing the necessary humidity and
temperature control for a building, differential
pressure zones should be established within a
building to ensure that the air flows from areas
with lower hazardous contamination potential to
areas with more hazardous contamination
potential.
2. Dilution ventilation - Dilution ventilation is the
once-through flow technique of exchanging
outside air for inside air for comfort and basic
contamination control.
3. Room-air detritiation systems - Such a system
uses tritium monitors located in the room
exhaust to activate (close) fast acting dampers.
The dampers then route the exhaust through a
special oxidation/drying system and return the
air to the room.
3. Local exhaust ventilation - The primary
advantage of local exhaust ventilation
techniques is the removal of airborne tritium,
regardless of its evolution rate or chemical or
physical form. In addition, these techniques
use relatively low flow rates compared to
normal ventilation requirements.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–10
I. Measurement techniques for tritium
1. Air monitoring - Fixed and portable ionization
chambers most widely used.
2. Differential monitoring - Separate monitoring
of HT and HTO components through the use
of bubblers in conjunction with desiccants or
catalysts.
3. Discrete sampling - Samples collected with a
bubbler or “cold finger” type sampler, then
later analyzed by liquid scintillation counting
techniques.
4. Process monitoring
• Stack, room, hood, glove box
• Mass spectroscopy, gas chromatography,
calorimetry
5. Surface monitoring
• Difficult to measure directly due to low-
energy emission
• May have some success with thin window
GM (pancake style probe), thin window
sodium iodine, or gas flow proportional
counters
• Smears taken for loose contamination,
and measured by dissolution and analysis
by liquid scintillation counting techniques
Section 11
6. Liquid Monitoring - Liquid scintillation
counting techniques
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–11
J. Bioassay program for tritium workers
An adequate bioassay program for tritium
workers would test for chronic and acute
exposure.
1. Chronic exposure - Periodic urinanalysis for
tritium (daily to biweekly identified in Tritium
Good Practices Manual)
2. Acute exposure
• Wait one to two hours.
• Void bladder.
• Collect sample as soon as possible
thereafter.
• Continue to collect daily to determine
individual half-life.
Dose from exposure to STCs may need to be
assessed based on air monitoring results, see
RCTP 99-02.
DOE-STD-1121-99, Internal Dosimetry, 1999,
provides guidance on internal dosimetry
programs including monitoring and assessing
dose from tritium.
K. Tritium effluent recovery systems
1. Purpose - Reduce tritium available for
release
2. Method - Tritium gas converted to HTO and
ultimately a stable waste form
.
Radiological Assessor Training
DOE-HDBK-1141-2001
Student’s Guide
Notes
Module 7–12
L. Inventory control and accountability for tritium
1. Nuclear materials, including tritium, need to
be controlled and have material
accountability.
2. Appendix D to the Tritium Good Practices
Manual discusses inventory control and
defines it to consist of:
• Measurements
• Measurement controls
• Determination of holdup in systems
• Development of predictors
• Establishment of accounting practices
Part 4 - Student's Guide