DOE-STD-1150-2026, Quality Assurance Functional Area Qualification Standard
The Quality Assurance (QA) Functional Area Qualification Standard (FAQS) establishes common functional area competency requirements for all DOE QA personnel who provide assistance, direction, guidance, oversight, or evaluation of contractor technical activities that could impact the safe operation of DOE’s defense nuclear facilities.
Version history and related documents
Supersedes
Earlier documents this one replaced.
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
NOT MEASUREMENT
SENSITIVE
DOE-STD-1150-2026
DOE STANDARD
QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONAL
AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD
DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities Technical Personnel
U.S. Department of Energy AREA TRNG
Washington, D.C. 20585
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
DOE-STD-1150-2026
ii
This document is available on the Department of Energy
National Training Center’s Federal Technical Capabilities SharePoint site at
https://ntc.doe.gov/sites/tqp/SitePages/Home.aspx
https://ntc.doe.gov/sites/tqp/SitePages/Home.aspx
DOE-STD-1150-2026
iii
APPROVAL
The Federal Technical Capabilities (FTC) Panel is responsible for reviewing and approving
Functional Area Qualification Standards (FAQSs) for department-wide application. Approval of
this FAQS from the FTCP is indicated by the signature below.
________________________________ ______________
Rick Denning, Vice-Chairperson Date
Federal Technical Capabilities Panel
DOE-STD-1150-2025
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPROVAL ................................................................................................................................... iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. v
ACRONYM LIST ............................................................................................................................1
PURPOSE ......................................................................................................................................2
APPLICABILITY .............................................................................................................................2
IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................................................................................2
EVALUATION CRITERIA ...............................................................................................................3
INITIAL QUALIFICATION AND CONTINUING TRAINING ................................................................4
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................4
BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE ..............................................................................................4
REQUIRED PERFORMANCE COMPETENCIES..........................................................................5
APPENDIX A ..............................................................................................................................10
INITIAL QUALIFICATION TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS................................................... 10
APPENDIX B ...............................................................................................................................12
CONTINUING TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................... 12
DOE-STD-1150-2026
v
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Enterprise Assessments, National Training Center (EA-
50), and Federal Technical Capabilities (FTC) Support Office facilitated the development of this
Quality Assurance FAQS.
The following quality assurance professionals participated in the development of this FAQS:
Section 2
Name Office
Chuck Smolens (Agent champion) NNSA Y-12 Field Office
Gabrielle Holcomb (team lead) Office of Environment, Health, Safety, and Security
(EHSS)
Dale Lertjuntharangool Office of Science, OSS-SAF
Garvey McKeown Office of Environment, Health, Safety, and Security
(EHSS)
Michael Pribish Office for Standards and Quality Assurance (EM-3.113)
Michael Sterling NNSA Y-12 Field Office
Oracio Torres DOE-Idaho, Nuclear Energy
Gladys Udenta NNSA, NA-ESH-22
Johnnie Nevarez Enterprise Assessments (EA-50), NTC
Melissa Otero Enterprise Assessments (EA-50), NTC
1
ACRONYM LIST
DEAR Department of Energy Acquisition Regulations
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
FAQS Functional Area Qualification Standard
FAR Federal Acquisition Regulations
FR Facility representative
FTC Federal Technical Capabilities
FTCP Federal Technical Capabilities Panel
G Guide
ISMS Integrated Safety Management System
O Order
QA Quality Assurance
QA SME Quality Assurance subject matter expert
QAP Quality Assurance Program
QAPD Quality Assurance Program Description
QMS Quality Management System
QO Qualifying official
S/CI Suspect/Counterfeit items
STD Standard
TQP Technical Qualification Program
2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
FUNCTIONAL AREA QUALIFICATION STANDARD
Quality Assurance Oversight
PURPOSE
Functional area qualification standards (FAQSs) establish common performance competencies
in key nuclear facility functional areas for personnel in the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Technical Qualification Program (TQP).
This FAQS establishes performance competencies to ensure designated personnel have the
technical competence to perform the duties and responsibilities of a quality assurance (QA)
oversight professional.
The content of this FAQS should be referenced and used, as appropriate, to develop vacancy
announcements, interview questions, and other criteria associated with the recruitment,
selection, and placement of personnel assigned to this FAQS.
APPLICABILITY
The DOE Order (O) 426.1, Department of Energy Federal Technical Capabilities, requires
FAQS to be developed for DOE employees whose duties and responsibilities could affect the
safe operation of defense nuclear or high-hazard facilities to assist DOE program, field offices,
and sites with implementation of their organization-specific TQP.
This FAQS establishes common performance competencies for DOE personnel who perform
the duties and responsibilities of quality assurance (QA) personnel. For ease of transportability
of qualifications between DOE elements, program and field offices must use this FAQS without
modification or addition to the competency requirements.
Satisfactory and documented attainment of the competencies in this FAQS ensures personnel
possess the minimum requisite knowledge and skills to perform quality assurance oversight
duties and tasks. To supplement this FAQS, DOE O 426.1 requires organization-specific
qualification standards to establish unique organization (headquarters, field element, site, or
facility) level competencies.
IMPLEMENTATION
This FAQS, derived from a quality assurance professional job task analysis (JTA), is comprised
of performance competencies based on task performance. Each performance competency
includes knowledge requirements and, if necessary, mandatory performance activities
(MPAs). The objective of the MPA(s) is to demonstrate the competency has been met by
3
having the participant apply the related knowledge to satisfactorily perform the associated job
task.
Section 3
An evaluation guide has been developed for this FAQS detailing the expected level of
knowledge required to obtain qualification and assist the qualifying officials (QOs) responsible
for verifying the attainment of the knowledge. The evaluation guide is available through the
National Training Center (NTC) FTCP SharePoint site at:
https://ntc.doe.gov/sites/tqp/SitePages/Home.aspx.
For initial qualification, participants assigned this FAQS must demonstrate attainment of the
knowledge in the “Required Performance Competencies” section.
The MPAs listed in this FAQS must be satisfactorily performed and documented once. If any of
the evaluation criteria are not satisfactorily met, the designated QO may require the participant
to reperform the MPA. Some MPAs may be duplicated in other qualification standards. In these
cases, the designated QO must verify and document the satisfactory completion of each MPA
required by the applicable standards in eTQP.
Participants should perform the MPAs in their assigned work area(s). When participants cannot
perform the MPAs as written in their assigned work area(s) or within the required qualification
timeframe, supervisors may use other options to facilitate completion. These options include
performance in a simulated environment or making minor accommodations to either the MPA or
the evaluation criteria. Justification(s) for the accommodation(s) must be documented by the
QO, with approval of the supervisor and the FTCP agent.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Attainment of the performance competency knowledge requirements and MPAs listed in this FAQS
must be completed in accordance with the qualifying organization TQP plan (or policy) and the
requirements in DOE O 426.1. Satisfactory attainment of the competency knowledge
requirements and MPAs contained in this FAQS must be documented in the electronic Technical
Qualification Program (eTQP) at https://etqp.ntc.doe.gov.
Each performance competency includes knowledge requirements and/or MPAs designed to
demonstrate attainment of the competency. The QO verifies the evaluation criteria, including
organization-specific requirements, were satisfactorily met during observation of the MPA and/or
review of the MPA results. Attainment of competency knowledge or MPAs must be verified by a
designated QO using one (or a combination) of the following methods listed in DOE O 426.1:
• Satisfactory completion of a written examination
• Satisfactory completion of an oral evaluation
• Documented evaluation of equivalencies
• Completion of approved training courses that confirm attainment of specific knowledge
requirements
Once the performance competency knowledge requirements and the MPAs in this FAQS have
been attained by the participant and verified by a QO, the participant must satisfactorily
https://ntc.doe.gov/sites/tqp/SitePages/Home.aspx
https://etqp.ntc.doe.gov/
4
complete the final qualification activity requirements identified in DOE O 426.1 (and/or any
applicable organization-specific requirements) before being designated as a qualified quality
assurance oversight professional.
INITIAL QUALIFICATION AND CONTINUING TRAINING
Appendix A, Initial Qualification Training Recommendations, includes a list of NTC and external
training courses supporting the attainment of the required performance competencies for quality
assurance professional participants.
Appendix B, Continuing Training Recommendations, outlines courses for quality assurance
professional participants to participate in as part of the continuing training program.
Section 4
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following are typical duties and responsibilities expected of quality assurance professionals:
• Conduct oversight and monitoring activities to evaluate both Federal and contractor
compliance with the applicable requirements and regulations. This could include, but is not
limited to, leading or performing assessments of DOE Federal and contractor quality
assurance programs (QAPs) and processes to verify adequacy, effectiveness, and
compliance with applicable regulations, standards, and DOE orders.
• Analyze documents related to quality assurance.
• Review, monitor, and evaluate the organization’s and the contractor’s QAP, plans, and
processes to verify compliance with applicable regulations, standards, and DOE orders.
• Obtain and track information concerning QA issues throughout the organization’s area of
responsibility (e.g., the site) and provide advice and recommendations for corrective and
improvement actions to the applicable line management.
• Provide subject-matter expertise as requested.
Technical support duties are dependent on the organizational needs and the participant’s level of
subject-matter expertise and will not be addressed by the competencies in this FAQS. Position-
specific duties and responsibilities for quality assurance should be included in position
descriptions and other qualification standards as applicable.
BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE
The preferred education and experience for quality assurance are as follows:
1. Education: Undergraduate and Graduate: Major Study: Quality assurance, statistics,
mathematics, production management, industrial management, computer science,
engineering, engineering technology, physical sciences, textiles, or other fields related to
the position and meet the Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM’s) requirements for
occupational series 1910 (Quality Assurance) or 801 (General Engineering).
5
And/or
2. Experience: Three to five years’ experience in fields such as quality control, quality
inspection, contracting and purchasing, supply and storage, industrial or production
planning, research and engineering, maintenance, and test and evaluation that provided
(1) exposure to quality assurance or related work, (2) pertinent product or process
knowledge and skill, (3) the ability to interpret and apply contract requirements and
engineering specifications, and (4) professional working relationship skills. Industry
certifications such as American Society for Quality (ASQ) Certified Quality Engineer
(CQE), Certified Quality Auditor (CQA), American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME) Nuclear Quality Assurance-1 (NQA-1) Lead Auditor, or other related
certifications may be of benefit to this qualification. Specialized experience can be
demonstrated through possession of the knowledge requirements and performance of
tasks outlined in this standard.
The knowledge requirements and associated MPAs identified in this FAQS were developed
with the supposition that participants have the above preferred education and experience.
The supervisor and QO will determine if participants assigned this FAQS need additional
developmental assignments and supporting training. Equivalencies should be used in
accordance with DOE Order 426.1.
REQUIRED PERFORMANCE COMPETENCIES
Section 5
Each competency defines the expected level of knowledge and performance the participant
must attain. The performance competencies contained in this FAQS include additional
knowledge requirements that are distinct from the knowledge requirements contained in the
General Technical Base (GTB) Part A and B Qualification Standard (QS). Prior to (or in parallel
with) the initial qualification to this FAQS, participants must satisfy the requirements of the GTB
Part A and GTB Part B QS.
Note 1: When regulations, DOE directives, or other industry standards are referenced in this
FAQS, the most recent revision should be used. However, quality assurance oversight
participants and QOs should also refer to the versions of requirements included in the local
contract during qualification. Applicable knowledge requirements in predecessor documents
not included in this FAQS should be included in the organization-specific QS or continuing
training program.
Note 2: If specific evaluation criteria are not identified for any of the MPAs in this FAQS, the
following generic evaluation criteria should be used in conjunction with local requirements:
Generic MPA evaluation criteria:
• Identify criteria for the specific activity.
• Compare results to the criteria and document conclusions.
• Document identified issues or recommendations.
• Discuss, if applicable, how to communicate results to appropriate Federal and/or
contractor personnel.
6
Quality Assurance Fundamentals
1. A quality assurance professional shall demonstrate knowledge of quality assurance concepts
and fundamentals.
Knowledge Requirements:
A. Discuss calibration: standards, timeframes, frequency, and methods.
B. Discuss the differences between quality assurance and quality control.
C. Discuss sampling methodology and techniques.
D. Describe control of nonconforming and suspect/counterfeit items (S/CI).
E. Discuss application of various statistical concepts to QA, such as:
1. Data analysis for process improvement
2. Standard deviation
3. Probability
4. Bell curve
5. Trending
6. Sampling
7. Control charts
F. Discuss the overall benefit of performing QA at DOE.
G. Describe the relationship between the Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS)
and QA.
Quality Assurance Oversight Regulatory Requirements
2. A quality assurance professional shall demonstrate knowledge of the requirements for
implementing the Quality Assurance Program (QAP) in DOE O 414.1, Quality Assurance.
Knowledge Requirements:
A. Discuss the purpose, scope, and applicability of DOE O 414.1, Quality Assurance.
B. Discuss purpose, scope, and applicability of DOE P 450.4, Integrated Safety
Management Policy and integration with DOE O 414.1.
C. Discuss the contractor requirements listed in DOE O 414.1, Attachment 1.
D. Discuss the QA requirements listed in DOE O 414.1, Attachment 2, including the 10
criteria.
E. Discuss the items you would expect to see in a QAP to meet Attachment 2, Part B,
Suspect/Counterfeit Item (S/CI) Prevention.
1. Discuss the purpose and use of DOE-HDBK-1221-2024, Suspect/Counterfeit Items
Resource Handbook to meet S/CI requirements.
2. Discuss applicable provisions for S/CI reporting, such as:
a. DOE O 210.2, DOE Corporate Operating Experience Program
b. DOE O 221.1, Reporting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse to the Office of Inspector
General
7
c. DOE O 232.2, Occurrence Reporting and Processing of Operations Information
F. Discuss the software quality assurance items you would expect to see in a QAP.
Section 6
G. Discuss the applicability of 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirements,
Nuclear Safety Management, and how it aligns with DOE 414.1.
H. Discuss the purpose and use of these related guides and handbooks:
1. DOE G 414.1-1, Management and Independent Assessments Guide
2. DOE G 414.1-2, Quality Assurance Program Guide
3. DOE G 414.1-4, Safety Software Guide for Use with 10 CFR 830, Subpart A, Quality
Assurance Requirements, and DOE O 414.1C, Quality Assurance
I. Discuss the integration of DOE O 226.1, Implementation of Department of Energy
Oversight Policy, to your QAP.
J. Discuss how a graded approach is used to implement the requirements of the QAP.
K. List and discuss the consensus standards applicable to your site/contract QAPs.
L. Review your site's contract, specifically sections C, E, J (list B), H, and I. Discuss how
these sections apply to QA oversight.
M. Describe the flow down of DOE 414.1 requirements into the Quality Assurance Program
Description (QAPD).
Mandatory Performance Activities (MPA)
MPA 2.1: Review a QAP, then describe the following:
• How and where the graded approach is applied. Document your results.
• How and where an S/CI would be controlled and reported. Document
your results.
Quality Assurance Oversight Program Approval
3. A quality assurance professional shall evaluate and recommend approval of a contractor or
Federal QA program.
Knowledge Requirements:
A. Identify and list all QAPs at your site.
B. Identify and list the relevant consensus standard(s) used in the contractor or federal
QAP.
C. Identify and list the approval authorities for QAP(s) at your site.
D. Discuss the QAP approval process and cycle timelines.
E. Discuss your site's procurement and supplier selection process (flow down and supplier
approval) and the roles involved.
8
Mandatory Performance Activities (MPA)
MPA 3.1: Evaluate one currently approved QAP. Identify and document the
relevant requirements from DOE O 414.1 and 10 CFR 830, subpart A, if
applicable.
MPA 3.2: Review the QAP approval process and document expectations for
approval.
MPA 3.3: Participate in one of the following and evaluate requirements of the
program:
• Conduct a complete review of an existing annual review or newly
submitted QAP.
• Perform a vendor/supplier QAP or quality management system (QMS)
review.
Quality Assurance Oversight Program Implementation
4. A quality assurance professional shall perform oversight of a contractor’s QAP
implementation.
Knowledge Requirements:
A. Discuss the sources of information DOE utilizes to ensure proper implementation of
contractor and Federal QAPs.
B. Describe the various QA-focused oversight activities you can perform to verify Federal
and contractor implementation.
C. Discuss how the contractor assurance system (CAS) is integrated with the quality
assurance oversight process.
D. Review and discuss a Federal QA self-assessment.
E. Review and discuss a contractor’s QA self-assessment.
Mandatory Performance Activities (MPA)
MPA 4.1: Participate in a DOE-led assessment focused on at least one
quality assurance criteria from DOE O 414.1. Document the results.
MPA 4.2: Shadow a contractor-led assessment focused on quality assurance.
Document the results.
MPA 4.3: Conduct a document review of the flow down of Quality
Improvement (Criterion 3) requirements to Federal or contractor program
documents (e.g., procedures such as how CAS is utilized). Document your
observations.
9
Section 7
Quality Assurance Oversight Program Performance
5. A quality assurance professional must evaluate the performance of the QA program by
conducting oversight activities and analyzing the results.
Knowledge Requirements:
A. List and describe the oversight activities you will use to evaluate the QA program's
performance. Explain why these activities were chosen.
B. Discuss how QA oversight activities can help create proactive discussions with
contractors.
C. Discuss the expectations for incorporating quality into the design process for new or
major modifications to DOE Hazard Category 1, 2, and 3 facilities by demonstrating
knowledge of DOE-STD-1189-2016, Integration of Safety into the Design Process
(Invoked).
D. Discuss different methods of design analysis and design changes, and state how they
are documented and controlled.
E. Identify the methods of design verification and describe their relative advantages and
disadvantages.
F. Discuss the controls, including verification and validation, for computer software used to
originate design solutions and design verification.
Mandatory Performance Activities (MPA)
MPA 5.1: Assess a recent QA-related finding.
A. Determine whether the contractor’s issue significance determination
meets locally established criteria.
B. Identify the causal analysis technique(s) used to perform causal factor
identification.
C. Verify the adequacy of a contractor corrective action plan.
D. Document corrective action plan evaluation results, as appropriate.
E. Evaluate the adequacy of an issue closure and document the results.
10
APPENDIX A
INITIAL QUALIFICATION TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS
Technical education and/or training may include courses/training provided by the DOE, other
government agencies, outside vendors, or local educational institutions. Training topics should
also identify and address weaknesses in the knowledge and/or skills of the participant and
current technical issues related to the associated FAQS.
Table 1: Initial Qualification Training Recommendations
Quality Assurance Oversight
Regulatory Requirements
From Learning Nucleus:
SAF-101DE, General Technical Base (GTB 3.0)
ASME NQA-1 Lead Auditor Training
Commercial Grade dedication
Foundations of Project Management
SMP-205, Readiness Review
SBA-100DE, Nuclear Safety Basis Fundamentals
WS&H Webex Series: Integrated Safety Management,
Worker Safety and Health Webex Series, and posted
annual recordings
SCD-100DE, Suspect, Counterfeit, Defective, and
Fraudulent Items Awareness Training
EHS-SCD-200, Inspecting for Suspect/Counterfeit Items
Quality Assurance
Fundamentals
WRIT7010, Fundamentals of Writing at Graduate School
USA
American Society of Quality (ASQ): Process Auditing
Techniques (e-Learning Course)
Using Basic Statistics and Graphical Methods in Six
Sigma
Lean Six Sigma Belt training
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/course/view.php?id=74704
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/course/view.php?id=86258
https://nucleartraininginstitute.learnworlds.com/course/cgds
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/enrol/index.php?id=86432
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/course/view.php?id=202226
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/course/view.php?id=74580
https://www.energy.gov/ehss/wsh-webex-series
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/course/view.php?id=86176
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/course/view.php?id=86176
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/enrol/index.php?id=224660
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/enrol/index.php?id=210508
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/enrol/index.php?id=210508
https://asq.org/training/process-auditing-techniques-pat01jpr
https://asq.org/training/process-auditing-techniques-pat01jpr
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/enrol/index.php?id=51612
https://learningnucleus.energy.gov/enrol/index.php?id=51612
Section 8
11
Other Resources Quality Assurance Qualification Standard DOE-STD-
1150-2002 July 2012 Reference Guide
12
APPENDIX B
CONTINUING TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS
Quality assurance professional shall participate in a continuing training and qualification
programs that include the following elements:
1. Continuing technical education and/or training on topics directly related to quality
assurance oversight (as determined by management). This may include courses/training
provided by DOE, other government agencies, outside vendors, or local educational
institutions. It could also include self-study on QA topics and preparing QA training with
supervisor approval.
2. Continuing training topics should address identified weaknesses in the participant’s
knowledge or skills.
3. Specific continuing training requirements shall be documented in individual development
plans.
4. Continuing training may include observation and participation in on- or off-site
assessments.
5. The following are training courses that can benefit quality assurance oversight
personnel:
A. ASQ membership and courses at https://asq.org/
B. ASME membership and courses at https://www.asme.org/
C. ISO lead auditor training and others at https://www.iso.org/
D. NQA-1 lead auditor and others at https://www.asme.org/
E. QA Scholars series at (coming soon from NTC)
6. Email qualityassurance@hq.doe.gov for additional information about the Quality
Assurance Community of Practice.
https://asq.org/
https://www.asme.org/
https://www.iso.org/
https://www.asme.org/
mailto:qualityassurance@hq.doe.gov
APPROVAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACRONYM LIST
PURPOSE
APPLICABILITY
IMPLEMENTATION
EVALUATION CRITERIA
INITIAL QUALIFICATION AND CONTINUING TRAINING
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE
REQUIRED PERFORMANCE COMPETENCIES
APPENDIX A
INITIAL QUALIFICATION TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDIX B
CONTINUING TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS