DOE-HDBK-1106-97 (Part 1 of 3), Radiological Contamination Control Training for Laboratory Research - Program Management Guide
Functional areas: Radiological Contamination Control Training, Laboratory Research
This program management guide describes the proper implementation standard for core training as outlined in the DOE
Radiological Control (RadCon) Standard. The guide is to assist those individuals, both within the Department of Energy (DOE) and Managing and Operating (M&O) contractors, identified as having responsibility for implementing the core training recommended by the RadCon Standard.
Unknown Block text
Version history and related documents
Superseded by
A newer version replaces this document.
Related documents
Document text
Text extracted from the attached file. Refer to the original document for the authoritative version.
Section 1
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
February 1997
Reaffirmation
August 2002
Change Notice 1
December 2004
DOE HANDBOOK
RADIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION
CONTROL TRAINING FOR
LABORATORY RESEARCH
U.S. Department of Energy FSC 6910
Washington, D.C. 20585
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
NOT MEASUREMENT
SENSITIVE
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
ii
This document has been reproduced from the best available copy.
Available to DOE and DOE contractors from ES&H Technical Information Services,
U.S. Department of Energy, (800) 473-4375, fax: (301) 903-9823.
Available to the public from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology
Administration, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161;
(703) 605-6000.
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
iii
Page/Section Change
Throughout
document
Revise Radcon Manual to RadCon Standard.
Revise RCM to RCS.
Revise RCM, Rev. 1 to RCS, Ch. 1.
iii, Forward, last
para.
Revise bottom para to read (updated software used and web address):
This Handbook is available in Word 2002 and has been formatted for
printing on an HP IV (or higher) LaserJet printer. Copies of this
Handbook may be obtained from either the DOE Radiation Safety
Training Home Page Internet site
(http://www.eh.doe.gov/radiation/RST/rstmater.htm) or the DOE
Technical Standards Program Internet site
(http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/). Documents downloaded from the
DOE Radiation Safety Training Home Page Internet site may be
manipulated using the software noted above (current revision or
higher).
Part 1 page 12 Revise:
DOE-HDBK-1130-98, “Radiological Worker Training” and DOE-
HDBK-1131-98, “General Employee Radiological Training”.
To read:
DOE-HDBK-1130-98, Reaffirmation 2004, “Radiological Worker
Training”, and DOE-HDBK-1131-98, Reaffirmation 2004, “General
Employee Radiological Training”.
Part 1, page 13 Revise:
DOE-HDBK-1130-98
To read:
DOE-HDBK-1130-98, Reaffirmation 2004
Part 1, page 15 Revise;
All materials are provided in WordPerfect® 9.0 format.
To read:
All materials are provided in Word 2002 format.
Part 1, page 16
Revise:
DOE (1990), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiation Protection of the
Public and the Environment,” DOE Order 5400.5.
DOE (1999), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiological Control
Standard,” DOE-STD-1098-1999.
DOE (1996), “Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting
Requirements,” DOE Order 231.1.
DOE (1998), U.S. Department of Energy, DOE-HDBK-1130-98,
“Radiological Worker Training,” and DOE-HDBK-1131-98, “General
Employee Radiological Training.”
To read:
DOE (1993), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiation Protection of the
Public and the Environment,” DOE Order 5400.5, Ch. 2.
DOE (2004), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiological Control
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
iv
Standard,” DOE-STD-1098-1999, Ch. 1.
DOE (2004), “Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting
Requirements,” DOE Order 231.1A, Ch. 1.
DOE (1998), U.S. Department of Energy, DOE-HDBK-1130-98,
Reaffirmation 2004, “Radiological Worker Training,” and DOE-
HDBK-1131-98, Reaffirmation 2004, “General Employee Radiological
Training.”
Part 2, page 4
Part 3, page 41
Revise:
DOE (1990), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiation Protection of the
Public and the Environment,” DOE Order 5400.5.
DOE (1999), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiological Control
Standard,” DOE-STD-1098-1999.
DOE (1995), “Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting
Requirements,” DOE Order 231.1.
DOE (1998), U.S. Department of Energy, DOE-HDBK-1130-98,
“Radiological Worker Training,” and DOE-HDBK-1131-98, “General
Employee Radiological Training.”
Section 2
To read:
DOE (1993), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiation Protection of the
Public and the Environment,” DOE Order 5400.5, Ch. 2.
DOE (2004a), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiological Control
Standard,” (RCS) DOE-STD-1098-1999, Ch. 1.
DOE (2004b), “Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting
Requirements,” DOE Order 231.1A, Ch. 1.
DOE (1998), U.S. Department of Energy, DOE-HDBK-1130-98,
Reaffirmation 2004, “Radiological Worker Training,” and DOE-
HDBK-1131-98, Reaffirmation 2004, “General Employee Radiological
Training.”
Delete:
DOE (1996), “Radiological Protection for DOE Activities,” DOE
Notice 441.2.
Part 2, page 11 Replace - trainees with - trainees’
Part 2, page 23
Replace: Reference: DOE N 441.2
With: Reference: 10 CFR 835
Replace: “An area or structure where radioactive material is used,
handled, or stored.”
With: “An area or structure where radioactive material, exceeding the
values provided in 10 CFR 835 Appendix E, is used, handled, or
stored.”
Part 2, page 24 Replace 10,000* with 10,000
Delete: “(This definition may change in an amendment to 10 CFR 835.
Make appropriate revisions at that time).”
Replace: “Any area where contamination levels are greater than the
values specified in Appendix D of 10 CFR 835, but less than or equal to
100 times those levels.”
With: “Any area where removable contamination levels are greater than
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
v
the values specified in Appendix D of 10 CFR 835, but less than or
equal to 100 times those levels.”
Part 2, page 25 Delete: “(This definition may change in an amendment to 10 CFR 835.
Make appropriate revisions at that time).”
Replace: “Any area where contamination levels are greater than 100
times the values specified in Appendix D of 10 CFR 835.”
With: “Any area where removable contamination levels are greater than
100 times the values specified in Appendix D of 10 CFR 835.”
Replace: “Any area where the measured concentration of airborne
radioactivity, above natural background, exceeds or is likely to exceed
10 percent of the derived air concentration (DAC) values listed in
Appendix A or Appendix C of 10 CFR 835.”
With: “Any area where the measured concentration of airborne
radioactivity, above natural background, exceeds or is likely to exceed
the derived air concentration (DAC) values listed in Appendix A or
Appendix C of 10 CFR 835 or where an individual in the area without
respiratory protection could receive an intake exceeding 12 DAC-hours
in a week.”
Part 2, page 26 Replace: Reference: DOE N 441.2
With: Reference: 10 CFR 835
Part 2, page 40 Replace: Reference: DOE (1990)
With: Reference: DOE (1993)
Replace: Order 5400.5,
With: Order 5400.5, Ch. 2
Part 2, pages 50,
107, 112 and 113
Part 3, pages 89 and
90
Replace: 5400.5
With: 5400.5, Ch. 2
Part 2, Glossary
Part 3, Glossary
Replace the following definitions:
Airborne radioactive material or airborne radioactivity means
radioactive material dispersed in the air in the form of dusts, fumes,
particulates, mists, vapors, or gases.
Sealed radioactive source means a radioactive source manufactured,
obtained, or retained for the purpose of utilizing the emitted radiation.
The sealed radioactive source consists of a known or estimated quantity
of radioactive material contained within a sealed capsule, sealed
between layer(s) of non-radioactive material, or firmly fixed to a non-
radioactive surface by electroplating or other means intended to prevent
leakage or escape of the radioactive material. Sealed radioactive
sources do not include reactor fuel elements, nuclear explosive devices,
and radioisotope thermoelectric generators.
Section 3
Part 2, page 115
Part 3, page 91
Replace: “RESERVED RESERVED RESERVED”
With: “500 1500 20”
Part 3, page 14 Replace: “An area or structure where radioactive material is used,
handled, or stored.”
With: “An area or structure where radioactive material, exceeding the
values provided in 10 CFR 835 Appendix E, is used, handled, or
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
vi
stored.”
Replace: “Any area where contamination levels are greater than the
values specified in Appendix D of 10 CFR 835, but less than or equal to
100 times those levels.”
With: “Any area where removable contamination levels are greater than
the values specified in Appendix D of 10 CFR 835, but less than or
equal to 100 times those levels.”
Part 3, page 15 Replace 10,000* with 10,000
Replace: “Any area where contamination levels are greater than 100
times the values specified in Appendix D of 10 CFR 835.”
With: “Any area where removable contamination levels are greater than
100 times the values specified in Appendix D of 10 CFR 835.”
Replace: “Any area where the measured concentration of airborne
radioactivity, above natural background, exceeds or is likely to exceed
10 percent of the derived air concentration (DAC) values listed in
Appendix A or Appendix C of 10 CFR 835.”
With: “Any area where the measured concentration of airborne
radioactivity, above natural background, exceeds or is likely to exceed
the derived air concentration (DAC) values listed in Appendix A or
Appendix C of 10 CFR 835 or where an individual in the area without
respiratory protection could receive an intake exceeding 12 DAC-hours
in a week.”
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
vii
Foreword
This Handbook describes a recommended implementation process for core training as outlined in
the DOE Radiological Control Standard (RCS). The Handbook is to assist those individuals, both
within the Department of Energy (DOE) and Managing and Operating (M&O) contractors,
identified as having responsibility for implementing the core training recommended by the RCS.
This training may also be given to laboratory researchers to assist in meeting their job-specific
training requirements of 10 CFR 835.
This Handbook contains recommended training materials consistent with other DOE standardized
core radiological training material. The training material consists of the following documents:
Program Management Guide - This document contains detailed information on how to
use the Handbook material.
Instructor’s Guide - This document contains a lesson plan for instructor use, including
notation of key points for inclusion of facility-specific information.
Student’s Guide - This document contains student handout material and also should be
augmented by facility-specific information.
This Handbook is available in Word 2002 and has been formatted for printing on an HP IV (or
higher) LaserJet printer. Copies of this Handbook may be obtained from either the DOE
Radiation Safety Training Home Page Internet site
(http://www.eh.doe.gov/radiation/RST/rstmater.htm) or the DOE Technical Standards Program
Internet site (http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/). Documents downloaded from the DOE Radiation
Safety Training Home Page Internet site may be manipulated using the software noted above
(current revision or higher).
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
viii
This page intentionally left blank.
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
(Part 1 of 3)
Radiological Contamination Control Training for
Laboratory Research
Program Management Guide
Office of Environment, Safety & Health
U.S. Department of Energy
Section 4
February 1997
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
ii
This page intentionally left blank.
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
iii
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………… 1
Purpose and Scope…………………………………………………………………... 1
Management Guide Content……………………………………………………….... 1
Core Training Goal………………………………………………………………….. 1
Organizational Relationships and Reporting Structure……………………………… 1
Instructional Materials Development………………………………………………………. 3
Target Audience……………………………………………………………………... 3
Prerequisites…………………………………………………………………………. 3
Training Materials…………………………………………………………………… 4
Training Delivery……………………………………………………………………. 4
Exemptions…………………………………………………………………………... 4
Training Program Standards and Policies………………………………………………….. 5
Qualification of Instructors………………………………………………………….. 5
Technical Qualifications…………………………………………………………….. 5
Instructional Capability and Qualifications…………………………………………. 7
Selection of Instructors……………………………………………………………… 9
Test Administration………………………………………………………………….. 10
Program Records and Administration……………………………………………….. 12
Training Program Development/Change Requests………………………………….. 12
Audits (Internal and External)………………………………………………………..12
Evaluating Training Program Effectiveness……………………………………… ... 12
Course-Specific Information……………………………………………………………….. 13
Purpose………………………………………………………………………………. 13
Course Goal………………………………………………………………………….. 13
Target Audience……………………………………………………………………... 13
Course Description…………………………………………………………………... 13
Prerequisites…………………………………………………………………………. 13
Length……………………………………………………………………………….. 13
Test Bank……………………………………………………………………………. 13
Retraining……………………………………………………………………………. 13
Instructor Qualifications…………………………………………………………….. 14
Materials Checklist………………………………………………………………….. 15
Equipment Checklist………………………………………………………………… 15
Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………...16
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
iv
This page intentionally left blank.
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
1
Introduction
Purpose and Scope This program management guide describes the proper
implementation standard for core training as outlined in the DOE
Radiological Control (RadCon) Standard. The guide is to assist
those individuals, both within the Department of Energy (DOE)
and Managing and Operating (M&O) contractors, identified as
having responsibility for implementing the core training
recommended by the RadCon Standard.
Management Guide Content The management guide is divided into the following sections:
• Introduction
• Instructional Materials Development
• Training Program Standards and Policies
• Course-Specific Information
Core Training Goal The goal of the core training program is to provide a
standardized, baseline knowledge for those individuals
completing the core training. Standardization of the knowledge
provides personnel with the information necessary to perform
their assigned duties at a predetermined level of expertise.
Implementing a core training program ensures consistent and
appropriate training of personnel.
Organizational Relationships The DOE Office of Worker Protection Policy and Programs
and Reporting Structure (EH-52) is responsible for approving and maintaining the
standardized core training materials associated with the core
training program. An oversight group consisting of
representatives from the major contractors will review comments
and recommend program changes to DOE EH.
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
2
Introduction (continued)
Section 5
Organizational Relationships The establishment of a comprehensive and effective contractor
and Reporting Structure site radiological control training program is the responsibility of
(continued) line management and their subordinates. The training function
can be performed by a separate training organization, but the
responsibility for quality and effectiveness rests with the line
management.
Instructional Materials Development Next
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
3
Instructional Materials Development (continued)
Target Audience Course instructional materials were developed for specific
employees who are responsible for knowing or using the
knowledge or skills for each course. With this in mind, the
participant should never ask the question, "Why do I need to
learn this?" However, this question is often asked when the
participant cannot apply the content of the program. It is the
responsibility of management to select and send workers to
training who need the content of the program. When workers can
benefit from the course, they can be motivated to learn the
content and apply it on their jobs. Care should be taken to read
the course descriptions along with the information about who
should attend. Participants and DOE facilities alike will not
benefit from workers attending training programs unsuitable for
their needs.
Prerequisites A background and foundation of knowledge facilitates the
trainee in learning new knowledge or skills. It is much easier to
learn new material if it can be connected or associated to what
was previously learned or experienced. Curriculum developers
who have been involved in preparing instructional materials for
the core training know this and have established what is referred
to as "prerequisites" for each course.
Certain competencies or experiences of participants were also
identified as necessary prior to participants attending a course.
Without these competencies or experiences, the participants
would be at a great disadvantage and could be easily discouraged
and possibly fail the course. It is not fair to the other participants,
the unprepared participant, and the instructor to have this
misunderstanding.
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
4
Instructional Materials Development (continued)
Training Materials Training materials for the core program consists of lesson plans,
study guides, training aids, handouts, and in some cases, video.
Overhead transparencies are sometimes provided in support of
the core training content and may be substituted with updated,
facility specific, or other information or material.
Supplemental material and training aids may be developed to
address facility-specific radiological concerns and to suit
individual training styles. References are cited in each lesson
plan and may be used as a resource in preparing facility-specific
information and training aids.
Each site is responsible for establishing a method to differentiate
the facility-specific information from the standardized core
lesson plan material. When additional or facility-specific
information is added to the text of the core lesson plan material,
a method should be used to differentiate site information from
core material.
Training Delivery Sites are encouraged to expand per provisions in the RadCon
Standard and enhance the training materials through advanced
training technologies. Computer-based training and multimedia
are just a sample of such technologies.
Section 6
Exemptions Qualified personnel can be exempted from training if they have
satisfactorily completed training programs (e.g., facility, college
or university, military, or vendor programs) comparable in
instructional objectives, content, and performance criteria, and
have demonstrated this by the successful completion of an exam.
The individual making the determination of comparability
should be a subject matter expert in the course topic.
Documentation of the applicable and exempted portions of
training should be maintained.
Training Program Standards and Policies Next
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
5
Training Program Standards and Policies
Qualification of Instructors The technical instructor plays a key role in the safe and efficient
operation of DOE facilities. Workers must be well qualified and
have a thorough understanding of the facility's operation, such as
processing, handling, and storage of materials, and maintenance
of equipment. Workers must know how to correctly perform
their duties and why they are doing them. They must know how
their actions influence other worker's responsibilities. Because
workers' actions are so critical to their own safety and the safety
of others, their trainers must be of the highest caliber. The
technical instructor must understand thoroughly all aspects of the
subjects being taught and the relationship of the subject content
to the total facility. Additionally, the instructor must have the
skills and knowledge to employ the instructional methods and
techniques that will enhance learning and successful job
performance. While the required technical and instructional
qualifications are listed separately, it is the combination of these
two factors that produces a qualified technical instructor.
The qualifications are based on the best industry practices that
employ performance-based instruction and quality assurances.
These qualifications are not intended to be restrictive, but to help
ensure that workers receive the highest quality training possible.
This is only possible when technical instructors possess the
technical competence and instructional skills to perform assigned
instructional duties in a manner that promotes safe and reliable
DOE facility operations.
Technical Qualifications Instructors must possess technical competence (theoretical and
practical knowledge along with work experience) in the subject
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
6
Training Program Standards and Policies (continued)
Technical Qualifications areas in which they conduct training. The foundation for
(continued) determining the instructor's technical qualifications are based on
two factors:
• The trainees being instructed.
• The subject being presented.
The following is an example of a target audience, subject to be
taught, and instructor technical qualifications.
Methods for verifying the appropriate level of technical
competence may include the review of prior training and
education, observation, and evaluation of recent related job
performance, and oral or written examination. Other factors that
may be appropriate consideration include DOE, NRC, or other
government license or certification, vendor or facility
certification, and most importantly job experience.
Continued on Next Page
TARGET
AUDIENCE
SUBJECT BEING
TAUGHT
TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION
Laboratory
Researchers
Contamination
Control
Section 7
Demonstrated knowledge and skills in radiation
protection, above the level to be achieved by the
trainees, as evidenced by previous
training/education and through job performance,
AND
Completion of all qualification requirements for
the senior-level radiation protection technician
position at the trainees’ facility or a similar
facility
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
7
Training Program Standards and Policies (continued)
Technical Qualifications To maintain technical competence, a technical instructor should
(continued) continue to perform satisfactorily on the job and participate I
continuing technical training.
Instructional Capability and Qualifications of instructional capability should be based on
Qualifications demonstrated performance of the instructional tasks for the
specific course requirements and the instructor's position.
Successful completion of instructor training and education
programs, as well as an evaluation of on-the-job performance, is
necessary for verification of instructional capability.
Instructional capability qualification should be granted as the
successful completion of an approved professional development
program for training instructors. The program should contain
theory and practice of instructional skills and techniques; adult
learning; and planning, conducting, and evaluating classroom,
simulator, laboratory, and on-the-job training activities.
Illustrated talks, demonstrations, discussions, role playing, case
studies, coaching, and individual projects and presentations
should be used as the principal instructional methods for
presenting the instructional training program. Each instructional
method should incorporate the applicable performance-based
principles and practices. Every effort should be made to apply
the content to actual on-the-job experience or to simulate the
content in the classroom/laboratory. The appropriate
methodology required to present the instructional content will
indicate a required level of instructional qualification and skill.
Current instructors' training, education, and job performance
should be reviewed to determine their training needs for
particular courses.
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
8
Training Program Standards and Policies (continued)
Instructional Capability and Based on this review, management may provide exemptions
Qualifications (continued) based on demonstrated proficiency in performing technical
instructor’s tasks
Through training or experience, technical instructors should be
able to: *
• Review instructional materials and modify to fully meet
the needs of the training group.
• Arrange the training facility (classroom/laboratory or other
instructional setting) to meet the requirements for the
training sessions.
• Effectively communicate, verbally and non-verbally,
lessons to enhance learning.
• Invoke student interaction through questions and student
activity.
• Respond to students’ questions.
• Provide positive feedback to students.
• Use appropriate instructional materials and visual aids to
meet the lesson objectives.
• Administer performance and written tests.
• Ensure evaluation materials and class rosters are
maintained and forwarded to the appropriate
administrative personnel.
• Evaluate training program effectiveness.
• Modify training materials based on evaluation of training
program.
*Stein, F. Instructor Competencies: The Standards. International
Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction;
1992.
Section 8
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
9
Training Program Standards and Policies (continued)
Selection of Instructors Selection of instructors should be based on the technical and
instructional qualifications specified in the “Course-Specific
Information” section of this guide. In addition to technical and
instructional qualifications, oral and written communication
skills, and interpersonal skills, should be included in the process
of selecting and approving instructors.
Since selection of instructors is an important task, those who
share in the responsibility for ensuring program effectiveness
should:
• Interview possible instructors to ensure they understand the
importance of the roles and responsibilities of technical
instructors and are willing to accept and fulfill their
responsibilities in a professional manner.
• Maintain records of previous training, education, and work
experience.
Procedures for program evaluation will include documentation
of providing qualified instructors for generic and facility-specific
training programs.
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
10
Training Program Standards and Policies (continued)
Test Administration A test bank of questions for each course
that has an exam should be developed and content validated. As
the test banks are used, statistical validation of the test bank
should be performed to fully refine the questions and make the
tests as effective as possible. The questions contained in the test
bank are linked directly to the objectives for each course. In this
way, trainee weaknesses can be readily identified and remedial
procedures can be put into place. The test outcomes can also be
used to document competence and the acquisition of knowledge.
The test banks should also be used by the instructors to identify
possible weaknesses in the instruction. If numerous trainees fail
to correctly answer a valid set of questions for an objective, the
instruction for that objective needs to be reviewed for
deficiencies.
Written examinations may be used to demonstrate satisfactory
completion of theoretical classroom instruction. The following
are some recommended minimal requirements for the test banks
and tests:
• Tests are randomly generated from the test bank.
• Tests items represent all objectives in the course.
• All test bank items are content validated by a subject matter
expert.
• Test banks are secured and are not released either before or
after the test is administered.
• Trainees should receive feedback on their test performance.
• For the first administrations of tests, a minimum of 80%
should be required for a passing score. As statistical analysis
of test results is performed, a more accurate percentage for a
passing score may be identified.
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
11
Training Program Standards and Policies (continued)
Test Administration Test administration is critical in accurately assessing the trainee's
(continued) acquisition of knowledge being tested. The following rules
should be adhered to:
• Tests should be announced at the beginning of the training
sessions.
• Instructors should monitor trainees during completion of
tests.
• All tests and answers should be collected at the conclusion
of each test.
• No notes can be made by trainees concerning the test items.
• Effort should be made to eliminate all noise during the test
• No talking (aside from questions) should be allowed.
• Answers to questions during a test should be provided, but
Section 9
answers to test items should not be provided or alluded to.
• Where possible, multiple versions of each test should be
produced from the test bank for each test administration.
• After test completion, trainees may turn in their materials
and leave the room while other trainees complete their tests.
• Trainee scores on the tests should be held as confidential. No
other person should have access to results other than the
trainee and test administrator.
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
12
Training Program Standards and Policies (continued)
Program Records and Training records and documentation shall meet the requirements
Administration of 10 CFR 835.704.
Training Program All requests for program changes and revisions should be
Development/Change submitted using the form DOE 1300.3, Document Improvement
Requests Proposal, found at the end of this document.
Audits (Internal and Internal verification of training effectiveness should be
External) accomplished through senior instructor or supervisor observation
of practical applications and discussions of course material. All
results should be documented and maintained by the
organization responsible for Radiological Control training.
The core training program materials and processes should be
evaluated on a periodic basis by DOE-HQ. The evaluation
should include a comparison of program elements with
applicable industry standards and requirements.
Evaluating Training Program Verification of the effectiveness of Radiological Control training
Effectiveness should be accomplished per DOE-HDBK-1130-98,
Reaffirmation 2004, “Radiological Worker Training” and DOE-
HDBK-1131-98, Reaffirmation 2004, “General Employee
Radiological Training.” In addition, DOE/EH has issued
guidelines for evaluating the effectiveness of radiological
training through the DOE Operations Office and DOE Field
Offices.
Course-Specific Information Next
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
13
Course-Specific Information
Purpose This section of the program management guide is to assist those
individuals assigned responsibility for implementing the
Radiological Contamination Control Training for Laboratory
Research. Standardized implementation of this training ensures
consistent and appropriate training for all personnel.
Course Goal Upon completion of this training, the participant will understand
the basic radiological contamination control measures for
working in a laboratory, such as a biomedical research
laboratory.
Target Audience Individuals who have assigned duties as laboratory researchers.
Course Description This course illustrates and reinforces the skills and knowledge
needed to assist personnel with radiological controls for
laboratory research facilities.
Prerequisites None.
Length 2 - 8 hours (depending on facility-specific information and
incorporation of practical exercises.)
Test Bank Radiological Worker (DOE-HDBK-1130-98, Reaffirmation
2004).
Retraining Requalification same as radiological worker.
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
14
Course-Specific Information (continued)
Instructor Qualifications Instructors of this course have a major role in making it
successful and meeting the specified objectives. Instructors must
have related experience and be technically competent. In this
course it is imperative that the instructor have the background
and experience of working in biomedical research facilities.
Instructors must be able to relate their own work experience to
the workers in biomedical research facilities. Instructors must be
able to answer specific questions and use a variety of
instructional material to meet the objectives.
Section 10
Education:
Minimum of B.S. degree in Health Physics or related
discipline is preferred.
Certification:
Certification by American Board of Health Physics (ABHP) or
National Registry of Radiation Protection Technologists
(NRRPT) preferred.
Experience:
At least five years of applied radiological protection
experience in an operating radiological facility including
experience in radiological protection at biomedical research
facility or equivalent is preferred. The area of experience
should include:
• Radiological controls associated with biomedical research
facilities.
• Conducting surveys and monitoring at biomedical research
facilities.
Intimate knowledge of Federal regulations and guidance, and
best nuclear industry practices, pertaining to radiological
protection.
Continued on Next Page
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
15
Materials Checklist The following checklist should be used to ensure all training
materials are available. All materials are provided in Word 2002
format.
• Program Management Guide.
• Instructor's Guide.
• Student's Guide.
Equipment Checklist The following checklist should be used before training is
provided to ensure equipment is available and working.
• Overhead projector.
• Screen.
• Flip chart.
• Markers.
• Facility-specific monitoring equipment (as appropriate).
Bibliography Next
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
16
Bibliography: DOE standards, handbooks, and technical standards lists
(TSLs). The following DOE standards, handbooks, and TSLs
form a part of this document to the extent specified herein.
DOE (1993), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiation Protection
of the Public and the Environment,” DOE Order 5400.5, Ch. 2.
DOE (1998), U.S. Department of Energy, 10 CFR Part 835,
“Occupational Radiation Protection.”
DOE/CH-9401 (1993), “Performance of Surveys for
Unrestricted Release Facility Guidance,” R&D Laboratory
Working Group (RADWG), Health Physics Procedures (HP)
Committee.
DOE (2004), U.S. Department of Energy, “Radiological Control
Standard,” DOE-STD-1098-1999, Ch. 1.
DOE (2004), “Environment, Safety, and Health Reporting
Requirements,” DOE Order 231.1A, Ch. 1.
DOE (1995), EH-412 memorandum (R. Pelletier, Director,
Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance) to the field,
“Application of DOE Order 5400.5 Requirements for Release
and Control of Property Containing Radioactive Material.”
DOE (1998), U.S. Department of Energy, DOE-HDBK-1130-98,
Reaffirmation 2004, “Radiological Worker Training,” and DOE-
HDBK-1131-98, Reaffirmation 2004, “General Employee
Radiological Training.”
Other government documents, drawings, and publications.
The following government documents, drawings, and
publications form a part of this document to the extent
specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, the issues of
these documents are those cited in the contracting document.
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
17
Bibliography (continued)
NRC (1982), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory
Guide 8.18, “Information Relevant to Ensuring that
Occupational Radiation Exposures at Medical Institutions will be
ALARA.”
NRC (1982), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory
Guide 8.23, “Radiation Safety Surveys at Medical Institutions.”
NRC (1991), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part
20, “Standards for Protection Against Radiation.”
Federal Guidance Report No. 11 (1988), “Limiting Values of
Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion
Factors for Inhalation, Submersion, and Ingestion” (based on the
1987 Federal Radiation Protection Guidance), Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, 1988.
Non-Government documents
ANSI 13.12 (1999), “Surface Radioactivity Guides for Materials,
Equipment, and Facilities to be Released for Uncontrolled Use,”
HPS Standards Committee.
LA-4400 (1970), LA-4400, Los Alamos Handbook of Radiation
Monitoring.
Lorenzen (1994), W.A., Ring J.P., “The Management and
Operation of a Large Scale Decay-In-Storage Program,” paper
presented at 27th Mid-Year Topical Meeting of the Health
Physics Society, Albany, NY.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement
(NCRP), NCRP No. 106 (1989), “Radiation Protection for
Medical and Allied Health Personnel.”
Stein (1992), F., “Instructor Competencies: The Standards,”
International Board of Standards for Training, Performance and
Instruction.
DOE-HDBK-1106-97
18
This page intentionally left blank.